U law professor traces roots of same-sex marriage debate ...

As voters consider amending Minnesota?s constitution to define marriage as exclusively a heterosexual right, a University of Minnesota constitutional law professor dives into the U.S. Supreme Court case that led the nation to the doorstep of the issue of same-sex marriage in a just-released book.

For Dale Carpenter, a Republican who is active in trying to defeat the marriage amendment, the high court?s decision in 2003 to strike down the nation?s sodomy laws was the end of a story full of characters and legal drama. In his critically praised book, ?Flagrant Conduct, The Story of Lawrence v. Texas,? Carpenter explains a perfect case with a serious flaw and one of the most important Supreme Court decisions in 50 years.

In 1998, Houston police arrested John Lawrence and Tyrone Garner for having consensual sex in a private home, a crime under Texas law.

?Those are the most sympathetic gay rights cases,? Carpenter said. ?It was like a strike of lighting ? the best possible scenario in which to bring a case.?

Carpenter discovered the weaknesses of the case in eight years of research and writing as he developed the book from what started as a law review article.

?The men were not actually having sex,? he said. ?They were not a loving couple arrested in their home. The circumstance involved a false report to police.?

The police officers, as interviewed in the book, disagreed as to what they had witnessed. Carpenter writes that the defendants? lawyers knew that fact and had to proceed delicately so the case would not look like a set-up.

Their legal finesse moved the case successfully from one judicial level to the next. The lawyers had as their advantage the fact the police initiated the case with an arrest. Then, rather than dispute what the police observed, the defendants did not contest the claim so they could test the constitutionality of the law. Finally, because the defendants were arrested, they could eventually demonstrate that had actually been injured by an unconstitutional law.

High-wire act

Carpenter describes the incremental moves toward the U.S. Supreme Court as a high-wire act. ?The main fear was that if litigation were not successful it would reinforce a bad precedent,? an earlier Supreme Court decision upholding a sodomy law in Georgia, he said. ?And it would be used politically against gay men and lesbians. And when would you get this kind of chance again??

Plus, the legal team had to avoid what Carpenter calls the ?M? word. ?When you make an argument, you don?t want to instill fear in the justices that if they strike down the sodomy law, the next thing they must do is uphold same-sex marriage claims,? he said.

Defense lawyers had to convince the high court that Americans supported the right to privacy when it involved their intimate lives and that the justices would be following not leading the nation.

But the decision, according to Carpenter, did remove ?a huge judicial obstacle on the road to gay marriage. It described what?s at stake in the case as being about relationships.?

Carpenter explains in the book how Justice Antonin Scalia?s dissenting opinion actually underscored the argument by asking: If we decide people have the right to intimate relationships, how can we deny them the right to marry?

?In some ways, he wrote the first draft of the brief in favor of gay marriage,? Carpenter said.

Carpenter said he believes that Lawrence v. Texas is as far as Americans are going to go at this time in accepting gay and lesbian relationships.

?People believe that while gays and lesbians have the right to privacy in their personal lives, they believe that marriage is not simply the matter of one?s intimate life, it is the basis of the family structure and they believe that keeping gay couples from getting married is important to preserving families,? he said.

via U law professor traces roots of same-sex marriage debate | MinnPost.

Email this post

Related posts:

1. California gay marriage ruling setback for proponents
2. Marriage is best for raising children
3. Two Vancouver school trustees want to be removed from campaign against gay marriage
4. Marriage attacked and defended
5. Modern romance: Gen-Y is late to the wedding, but wants marriage

About or from a variety of publications on EducationViews.org

?The quality and variety of the selections you will find on EducationViews.org is second-to-none on the internet today. Since 1997 we have been providing this service at no cost to education professionals, the public in general and policy makers. Hope you enjoy the articles and commentary. Please forward us to your friends and associates. EducationViews.org is maybe the most effective way to transforming educators. The daily email offers a direct and easy way for busy teachers to grow philosophically. I was skeptical, but once you open the email and decide to read a story, you are hooked and it becomes a daily ritual to check out what?s happening. Educating teachers as to what is really going on in the schools opens up a new worldview and vision of thinking most have not been exposed to. The end result, better informed teachers who have a more effective understanding of the principles that make academic achievement a reality. Great job. The more email addresses of educators you get on your list, the bigger the impact and the more kids you will positively influence.

Source: http://educationviews.org/2012/03/14/u-law-professor-traces-roots-of-same-sex-marriage-debate/

aubrey o day nfl playoff schedule tim howard scores nick cannon kidney failure consumer financial protection bureau casey anthony video recess appointment